# Question

Consider the data shown in Table 12E.1. The target value for this process is 200.

(a) Set up an integral controller for this process. Assume that the gain for the adjustment variable is g = 1.2 and assume that = 0.2 in the EWMA forecasting procedure will provide adequate one-step-ahead predictions.

(b) How much reduction in variability around the target does the integral controller achieve?

(c) Rework parts (a) and (b) assuming that = 0.4. What change does this make in the variability around the target in comparison to that achieved with = 0.2?

(a) Set up an integral controller for this process. Assume that the gain for the adjustment variable is g = 1.2 and assume that = 0.2 in the EWMA forecasting procedure will provide adequate one-step-ahead predictions.

(b) How much reduction in variability around the target does the integral controller achieve?

(c) Rework parts (a) and (b) assuming that = 0.4. What change does this make in the variability around the target in comparison to that achieved with = 0.2?

## Answer to relevant Questions

Use the data in Exercise 12.6 to construct a bounded adjustment chart. Use λ = 0.2 and set L = 12. How does the bounded adjustment chart perform relative to the integral control adjustment procedure in part (a) of Exercise ...R.D. Snee (“Experimenting with a Large Number of Variables,” in Experiments in Industry: Design, Analysis and Interpretation of Results, by R.D. Snee, LB. Hare, and J.B. Trout, eds., ASQC, 1985) describes an experiment ...Reconsider the crack experiment from Exercise 13.19. Suppose that the two crack-length measurements were made on two cracks that formed in the same test coupon at each set of test conditions. Are the two observations ...The data shown in Table 14E.5 were collected in an experiment to optimize crystal growth as a function of three variables x1, x2, and x3. Large values of y (yield in grams) are desirable. Fit a second-order model and analyze ...Consider the response model in equation 14.5. Suppose that in the response model we allow for a complete second-order model in the noise factors so that What effect does this have on the variance model?Post your question

0