# Question: Consider the following two earnings forecasting models Et EPSt 1

Consider the following two earnings forecasting models:

Et(EPSt+1) is the expected forecasts of earnings per share for year t+1, given information available at t. Model 1 is usually called a random walk model for earnings, whereas Model 2 is called a mean-reverting model. The earnings per share for TJX for the fiscal years ending January 2006 (FY2005) through January 2010 (FY2009) are as follows:

a. What would be the forecast for earnings per share in FY2010 for each model?

b. Actual earnings per share for TJX in FY2010 were $3.30. Given this information, what would be the FY2011 forecast for earnings per share for each model? Why do the two models generate quite different forecasts? Which do you think would better describe earnings per share patterns?Why?

Et(EPSt+1) is the expected forecasts of earnings per share for year t+1, given information available at t. Model 1 is usually called a random walk model for earnings, whereas Model 2 is called a mean-reverting model. The earnings per share for TJX for the fiscal years ending January 2006 (FY2005) through January 2010 (FY2009) are as follows:

a. What would be the forecast for earnings per share in FY2010 for each model?

b. Actual earnings per share for TJX in FY2010 were $3.30. Given this information, what would be the FY2011 forecast for earnings per share for each model? Why do the two models generate quite different forecasts? Which do you think would better describe earnings per share patterns?Why?

## Relevant Questions

Joe Fat cat, an investment banker, states: “It is not worth my while to worry about detailed, long-term forecasts. Instead, I use the following approach when forecasting cash flows beyond three years. I assume that sales ... How can a company with a high ROE have a low PE ratio?Recalculate the forecasts in Tables 8-2 assuming that the ratio of net operating working capital to sales is 3 percent, and the ratio of net long-term assets to sales holds steady at 33.4percent for all the years from fiscal ...Despite many years of research, the evidence on market efficiency described in this chapter appears to be inconclusive. Some argue that this is because researchers have been unable to link company fundamentals to stock ...Joe states, “I can see how ratio analysis and valuation help me do fundamental analysis, but I don’t see the value of doing strategy analysis.” Can you explain to him how strategy analysis could be potentially useful?Post your question