# Question

Continuation of Exercise 9.11. If a Weibull distribution has a shape parameter of , it can be reasonably well approximated by a normal distribution with the same mean and variance. For the situation of Exercise 9.11, calculate the reliability at 600 hours using the normal distribution. How close is this to the reliability value calculated from the Weibull distribution in Exercise 9.11?

## Answer to relevant Questions

Suppose that a unit had a Weibull time-to-failure distribution. The value of the scale parameter is . Graph the hazard function for the following values of the shape parameter: . For the fixed values of the scale ...Fifteen observations on the time to failure of a unit are as follows: 173, 235, 379, 439, 462, 455, 617, 41, 454, 1083, 371, 359, 588, 121, and 1066. Is the Weibull distribution a reasonable choice for the time to failure ...A series system has four independent identical components. The reliability for each component is exponentially distributed. If the reliability of the system at 8,000 hours must be at least 0.999, what MTTF must be specified ...Consider the system shown in the accompanying figure. The reliability of each component is provided in the figure. Assuming that the components operate independently, calculate the system reliability. An electronic component has an exponential time to failure distribution with hours. What are the mean and variance of the time to failure? What is the reliability at 7,000 hours?Post your question

0