# Question: Continuing Problem 8 on the 2009 golfer data in the

Continuing Problem 8 on the 2009 golfer data in the file P10_08.xlsx, the simple linear regressions for Earnings per Round were perhaps not as good as you expected. Explore several multiple regressions for Earnings per Round, using the variables in columns I–M and R. Proceed as follows.

a. Create a table of correlations for these variables.

b. Run a regression of Earnings per Round versus the most highly correlated variable (positive or negative) with Earnings per Round. Then run a second regression with the two most highly correlated variables with Earnings per Round. Then run a third with the three most highly correlated, and so on until all six explanatory variables are in the equation.

c. Comment on the changes you see from one equation to the next. Does the coefficient of a variable entered earlier change as you enter more variables? How much better do the equations get, in terms of standard error of estimate and R2, as you enter more variables? Does adjusted R2 ever indicate that an equation is worse than the one before it?

d. The bottom line is whether these variables, as a whole, do a very good job of predicting Earnings per Round. Would you say they do? Why or why not?

a. Create a table of correlations for these variables.

b. Run a regression of Earnings per Round versus the most highly correlated variable (positive or negative) with Earnings per Round. Then run a second regression with the two most highly correlated variables with Earnings per Round. Then run a third with the three most highly correlated, and so on until all six explanatory variables are in the equation.

c. Comment on the changes you see from one equation to the next. Does the coefficient of a variable entered earlier change as you enter more variables? How much better do the equations get, in terms of standard error of estimate and R2, as you enter more variables? Does adjusted R2 ever indicate that an equation is worse than the one before it?

d. The bottom line is whether these variables, as a whole, do a very good job of predicting Earnings per Round. Would you say they do? Why or why not?

**View Solution:**## Answer to relevant Questions

Using the sample data given in the file P10_10.xlsx, use multiple regressions to predict the selling price of houses in a given community. Proceed as follows.a. Add one explanatory variable at a time and estimate each ...Estimate a regression equation that adequately estimates the relationship between monthly electrical power usage (Y) and home size (X) using the data in the file P10_13.xlsx. Interpret your results. How well does your model ...Continuing Problem 19, revise the previous multiple regression equation to include an interaction term between the return on average equity (X1) and annual dividend rate (X2).a. Estimate your revised equation using the data ...The beta of a stock is found by running a regression with the monthly return on a market index as the explanatory variable and the monthly return on the stock as the dependent variable. The beta of the stock is then the ...The Baker Company wants to develop a budget to predict how overhead costs vary with activity levels. Management is trying to decide whether direct labor hours (DLH) or units produced are the better measure of activity for ...Post your question