Corinth Co. leased equipment to Athens Corporation for an eight-year period, at which time possession of the leased asset will revert back to Corinth. The equipment cost Corinth $16 million and has an expected useful life of 12 years. Its normal sales price is $22.4 million. The present value of the minimum lease payments for both the lessor and lessee is $20.4 million. The first payment was made at the inception of the lease. Collectibility of the remaining lease payments is reasonably assured, and Corinth has no material cost uncertainties. How should Athens classify this lease? Why?
Answer to relevant QuestionsIn the situation described in BE 15-4, how should Corinth classify this lease? Why?In the situation described in BE 15-8, assume the asset being leased cost the lessor $125,000 to produce. Determine the price at which the lessor is “selling” the asset (present value of the lease payments). What would ...Manufacturers Southern leased high-tech electronic equipment from Edison Leasing on January 1, 2011. Edison purchased the equipment from International Machines at a cost of $112,080.Required:Prepare a lease amortization ...Airway Leasing entered into an agreement to lease aircraft to Ouachita Airlines. Consider each of the following, a–e, to be independent scenarios.a. The agreement calls for ownership of the aircraft to be transferred to ...Refer to the lease agreement described in the previous exercise. Assume the contract specified that NRC (the lessor) was to pay, not only the $5,000 maintenance fees, but also insurance of $700 per year, and was to receive a ...
Post your question