Question: Daniel E Beren John M Elliot and Edward F Mannino
Daniel E. Beren, John M. Elliot, and Edward F. Mannino formed Walnut Street Four, a general partnership, to purchase and renovate an office building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. They borrowed more than $ 200,000 from Hamilton Bank to purchase the building and begin renovation. Disagreements among the partners arose when the renovation costs exceeded their estimates. When Beren was unable to obtain assistance from Elliot and Mannino regarding obtaining additional financing, the partnership quit paying its debts. Beren filed an involuntary petition to place the partnership into Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The other partners objected to the bankruptcy filing. At the time of the filing, the partnership owed debts of more than $ 380,000 and had approximately $ 550 in the partnership bank account. Should the petition for involuntary bankruptcy be granted? In re Walnut Street Four, 106 B. R. 56, 1989 Bankr. Lexis 1806 (United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania)
Answer to relevant QuestionsJames F. Kost filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. First Interstate Bank of Greybull (First Interstate) held a first mortgage on the debtor’s residence near Basin, Wyoming. ...UAL Corporation is the parent company of United Airlines, which was the largest scheduled passenger commercial airline in the world. On a daily basis, the airline offered more than 1,500 flights to 26 countries. The airline ...Jesse Spires was employed as a welder by Johnson Welded Products, Inc. Johnson Welded Products provides a lunchroom equipped with a microwave, refrigerator, and vending machine for sandwiches, snacks, and drinks. Spires ...Ronald Wayne Smith was employed by Modesto High School as a temporary math instructor. In addition, he coached the girls’ baseball and basketball teams. The contract under which he was employed stated that he “may be ...Theunion (Union)member-employees of the Erie Resistor Company (Company) struck Company over the terms of a new collective bar-gaining agreement that was being negotiated between Company and Union. Company continued ...
Post your question