Darling’s Rent- a- Car carried property insurance on its cars under a policy issued by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co. The policy listed Darling’s as the “insured.” Darling’s rented a car to Joshuah Farrington. In the rental contract, Farrington agreed to be responsible for any damage to the car and declined the optional insurance. Later, Farrington collided with a moose. Philadelphia paid Darling’s for the damage to the car and sought to collect this amount from Farrington. Farrington argued that he was an “insured” under Darling’s policy. How should “insured” be interpreted in this case? Why?
Answer to relevant QuestionsThe Legal Environment DimensionIs it relevant to the analysis of jurisdiction that Gucci America’s principal place of business is in New York state rather than California? Explain. The Social DimensionConsidering the ...Yvette Downey bought a children’s bedroom set from Bob’s Discount Furniture Holdings, Inc., in 2004. Soon, Downey and her daughter, Ashley Celester, began to ex-perience skin irritation. In July 2005, they discovered ...Mark Wooden sent an e- mail to an alderwoman for the city of St. Louis. Attached was a nineteen- minute audio file that compared her to the biblical character Jezebel. The audio said she was a “bitch in the Sixth Ward,” ...What If the Facts Were Different?Suppose that Johnson, in his 1999 will, had specifically mentioned that it was his intention that his children and grandchildren would not receive any portion of his estate. Would that have ...Susie Walker executed a will that left her entire estate to her grandson. When her grandson died, Susie executed a new will that named her great- grandson as her sole beneficiary and specifically disinherited her son, Tommy. ...
Post your question