Dave has been arrested in connection with a recent string of burglaries. While he was in custody, he was shown falsified laboratory results that connected him with the crimes. Based on the false evidence, Dave confessed to the crimes during interrogation. Dave was then given his Miranda warnings and booked. What constitutional rights may Dave assert to prevent his confession being used against him at trial? Does the state have any defenses available? Discuss fully.
Answer to relevant QuestionsConstruct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then, explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger, either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion. A company has a retention rate of 50%, sales of $25,000, beginning equity of $50,000 and profit margins of 10%, an asset turnover ratio of .75 and debt of $10,000. What is its sustainable growth rate?How do I perform closing entries on quick books. What are the steps to do it and in what format.Some taxpayers benefit from what is called a "marriage bonus." What is it? Who are these taxpayers that benefit?At the start of the current year, Indigo Corporation (a calendar year taxpayer) has accumulated E & P of $240,000. Indigo’s current E & P is $160,000, and at the end of the year, it distributes $440,000 ($220,000 each) to ...
Post your question