David Cooper purchased a computer and software for his supermarket business. He was using a soft- ware program recommended and installed by the seller, Contemporary Computer Systems, Inc. The sales contract had a clause that stated that no refunds would be given after the 90-day warranty period. Cooper initially had problems with both the hardware and the software. Contemporary Computer Systems tried to remedy these problems. A pattern of problems and attempts to fix them went on for some time, far beyond the 90-day period expressly described in the contract. When Cooper had had enough, he decided to revoke the contract and demand his money back. Contemporary Computer Systems said the 90-day express clause in the contract precluded this action. Who won?
Answer to relevant QuestionsExplain the reason behind the need for negotiable instruments. Are negotiable instruments more similar to money or contracts? Explain. Olga Ensenat, an 88-year-old woman, had substantial investment accounts. Eventually her niece, Diana Flores, moved in to take care of Ensenat. While living with her, Flores withdrew on Ensenat's accounts, forged Ensenat's ...First Jersey Securities, Inc., filed a petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained a court order against the firm to repay $75 million in illegal proceeds. On the same day ...Julaju drove a taxi on a part-time basis for El Pal- mar Taxi, Inc., usually only on Sundays and some- times on Mondays. He worked an unrelated job on the remaining days of the week. Julaju was given certain rules to ...
Post your question