Dayton Superior Corp. sells its products in inter-state commerce to several companies, including Spa Steel Products, Inc. The purchasers often compete directly with each other for customers. From 2005 to 2007, one of Spa Steel’s customers purchased Dayton Superior’s products from two of Spa Steel’s competitors. According to the customer, Spa Steel’s prices were always 10 to 15 percent higher for the same products. As a result, Spa Steel lost sales to at least that customer and perhaps others. Spa Steel wants to sue Dayton Superior for price discrimination. Which requirements for such a claim under Section 2 of the Clayton Act does Spa Steel satisfy? What additional facts will it need to prove?
Answer to relevant QuestionsGo to Case Analysis Case 46.1, Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., on pages 897 and 898. Read the excerpt and answer the following questions. (a) Issue: The dispute in this case was between which parties ...Nora, an accountant, prepares a financial statement as part of a registration statement that Omega, Inc., files with the Securities and Exchange Commission before making a public offering of securities. The statement ...On learning that Sébastien planned to travel abroad, Roslyn asked him to deliver $ 25,000 in cash to her family in Mexico. During a customs inspection at the border, Sébastien told the customs inspector that he carried ...What If the Facts Were Different?Suppose that exclusion k, instead of exclusion l, has used the phrase “by any person.” Would the result have been different? Explain.The Economic DimensionWhy did Valero and the Milas ...Sheila makes out a will, leaving her property in equal thirds to Toby and Umeko, her children, and Velda, her niece. Two years later, Sheila is adjudged mentally in competent, and that same year, she dies. Can Toby and Umeko ...
Post your question