Defendants driver Holland and Kelley, his passenger, were charged with drug possession with the intent to sell. Officers had arrested the driver on a misdemeanor, for changing lanes without signaling, after the officers had been advised by High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Area undercover officers to prevent the defendants from potentially robbing a confidential informant of narcotics. Upon arrest, officers had searched the center console of the vehicle, finding evidence that suggested their intent to sell drugs. The officers admitted to having no factual basis for believing that there was evidence of either defendant's drug possession within the vehicle at the time of arrest. Holland and Kelley argued that the search of the vehicle that ensued after the driver's arrest was unlawful and that evidence obtained through the arrest should be found inadmissible. The government argued that the arrest and search was lawful pursuant to the "good-faith exception" and the "inevitability exception." Whom do you think the court found in favor of? Why?
Answer to relevant QuestionsThe defendant, Raul Pol-Flores, refer red two investors to Luis Her rero-Rovira. The two investors were then defrauded of their entire $290,000 investment, and Pol received nearly $20,000 of the funds. When the two investors ...Explain the federal laws that are currently being used to try to fight white-collar crime. List five intentional torts, and explain the elements needed to prove each. GoTo.com's logo features a green circle surrounded by a yellow background, with the words Go and To printed in the circle. Disney Cor p. started to use its logo, a green circle surrounded by a yellow background with the word ...The plaintiff, Lone Star Steakhouse, operates over 30 Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon restaurants in the United States. The trademarks "Lone Star Café" and "Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon" are owned by Lone Star Steakhouse. ...
Post your question