Question: Diamonds clearly satisfy less important needs than water which is
Diamonds clearly satisfy less important needs than water, which is essential to life. Yet according to market prices, the essential commodity, water, is worth less than the less essential commodity, diamonds. Why would a vital commodity such as water sell for so much less than diamonds? Does this imply that there is something wrong with a market system that values diamonds more than water? Explain using demand and supply curves for water and diamonds. In your explanation, distinguish between the marginal and total benefit of the two commodities.
Relevant QuestionsDefine consumer surplus, and explain how you would show it in a diagram containing a demand curve for some product. What would consumer surplus equal in Figure if the demand was perfectly elastic at the market price of $ 3 ...Suppose that George is interested in only two goods, cigars and scotch. Employ the indifference curve/ budget line apparatus to show a case where a decrease in the price of cigars leads to an increase in George’s scotch ...In a two-year period, Anna has earnings of $ 6 million this year (year 1) and earnings of $ 10 million next year (year 2). She can borrow or lend at an interest rate of 25 percent. Suppose that Anna decides to borrow $ 1 ...Americans spend almost $ 700 billion per year on legalized gambling—roughly $ 200 billion more than they spend on groceries. Most Americans‚ however‚ also show evidence of risk aversion in other aspects of their ...Landing fees at many airports are based on aircraft weight. However, these fees do not accurately measure the cost associated with a landing or takeoff. This is because the opportunity cost of a plane using a runway ...
Post your question