Do you think Tara has violated the anticontact rule? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhy is it that the ABA’s rules of conduct do not apply to lawyers? If Erin had done drugs in the past and now wants to become an attorney, should her history of illegal drug use matter? If not, why? If so, then should it matter that she is already a paralegal with that history? When did paralegalism start to be recognized as a separate legal occupation? 1. Of all the UPL conduct listed in the case, could any of it be performed by a legitimate paralegal? 2. If there was an attorney involved with WTP/Sarasota, how was UPL committed? 3. After this decision, what is left for ...Do you think Tara has committed the unauthorized practice of law? Why or why not?
Post your question