Eastover Company (EO) is a large, diversified forest products company. Approximately 75 percent of its sales are from paper and forest products, with the remainder from financial services and real estate. The company owns 5.6 million acres of timberland, which is carried at very low historical cost on the balance sheet.

Peggy Mulroney, CFA is an analyst at the investment counseling firm of Centurion Investments. She is assigned the task of assessing the outlook for Eastover, which is being considered for purchase, and comparing it to another forest products company in Centurion’s portfolios, Southampton Corporation (SHC). SHC is a major producer of lumber products in the United States. Building products, primarily lumber and plywood, account for 89 percent of SHC’s sales, with pulp accounting for the remainder. SHC owns 1.4 million acres of timberland, which is also carried at historical cost on the balance sheet. In SHC’s case, however, that cost is not as far below current market as Eastover’s. Mulroney began her examination of Eastover and Southampton by looking at the five compo-nents of return on equity (ROE) for each company. For her analysis,

Mulroney elected to define equity as total shareholders’ equity, including preferred stock. She also elected to use year- end data rather than averages for the balance sheet items.

a. Based on the data shown in Tables 17C and 17D, calculate each of the five ROE components for Eastover and Southampton in 2013. Using the five components, calculate ROE for both companies in 2013.

b. Referring to the components calculated in part ( b), explain the difference in ROE for Eastover and Southampton in 2013.

c. Using 2013 data, calculate the sustainable growth rate for both Eastover and Southampton. Discuss the appropriateness of using these calculations as a basis for estimating future growth.