Edwards received unsolicited faxes from Direct Access in violation of the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to send unsolicited faxes. Edwards, a Nevada resident, sued Direct, not a Nevada resident, in state court in Nevada for damages allowed under the law. Direct contended that the suit could not be filed in state court because it concerned federal law, so Nevada courts did not have jurisdiction. Is that correct?
[Edwards v. Direct Access, 124 P.3d 1158 (Sup. Ct., Nev., 2005)]