# Question

This exercise looks into the relationship between clauses and implication sentences.

a. Show that the clause (—P1 V . . . V —Pm VQ) iS logically equivalent to the implication sentence (P1 Λ . . . Λ Pm) Q.

b. Show that every clause (regardless of the number of positive literals) can be written in the form (P1 Λ. . . Λ Pm) (Q1 V . V Qn), where the Ps and Qs are proposition symbols A knowledge base consisting of such sentences IS in implicative normal form or Kowalski form. c. Write down the full resolution rule for sentences in implicative normal form.

a. Show that the clause (—P1 V . . . V —Pm VQ) iS logically equivalent to the implication sentence (P1 Λ . . . Λ Pm) Q.

b. Show that every clause (regardless of the number of positive literals) can be written in the form (P1 Λ. . . Λ Pm) (Q1 V . V Qn), where the Ps and Qs are proposition symbols A knowledge base consisting of such sentences IS in implicative normal form or Kowalski form. c. Write down the full resolution rule for sentences in implicative normal form.

## Answer to relevant Questions

In this exercise, you will design more of the circuit-based wumpus agent.a. Write an equation, similar to Equation (7.4), for the Arrow proposition, which should be true when the agent still has an arrow. Draw the ...Consider a knowledge base containing just two sentences: P(α) and P(h). Does this knowledge base entail V x P(x)? Explain your answer in terms of models.Write a general set of facts and axioms to represent the assertion ‘Wellington heard about Napoleon’s death” and to correctly answer the question ‘Did Napoleon hear about Wellington’s death?”Extend the vocabulary from Section 8.4 to define addition for n-bit binary numbers. Then encode the description of the four-bit adder in Figure and pose the queries needed to verify that it is in factcorrect.Explain how to write any given 3-SAT problem of arbitrary size using a single first-order definite clause and no more than 30 ground facts.Post your question

0