Explain the definition of ethical relativism given in the text: “the view that there is no objective standard of right and wrong, even in principle.”
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhat are the differences among the three reasons for supporting ethical relativism given in this chapter? In particular, what is the basic difference between the first and second? Between the first and third?1. How does Pojman link ethnocentrism to relativism?2. How does Pojman explain the way that the diversity thesis and the dependency thesis lead to relativism?3. According to Pojman, what sorts of “absurd consequences” ...How does the example of the “ring of Gyges” illustrate the question “Why be moral?”What is Mill’s argument for the difference in value between intellectual and sensual pleasures?How does the character of moral obligation lead to Kant’s basic moral principle, the categorical imperative?
Post your question