# Question: Explain why the VIX formula in equation 24 29 overestimates implied

Explain why the VIX formula in equation (24.29) overestimates implied volatility if options are American.

The following three problems use the Merton jump formula. As a base case, assume S = $100, r = 8%, σ = 30%, T = 1, and δ = 0. Also assume that λ = 0.02, αJ =−0.20, and σJ = 0.30.

The following three problems use the Merton jump formula. As a base case, assume S = $100, r = 8%, σ = 30%, T = 1, and δ = 0. Also assume that λ = 0.02, αJ =−0.20, and σJ = 0.30.

**View Solution:**## Answer to relevant Questions

Using the Merton jump formula, generate an implied volatility plot for K = 50, 55, . . . 150. a. How is the implied volatility plot affected by changing αJ to−0.40 or−0.10? b. How is the implied volatility plot affected ...Using the CEV option pricing model, set β = 3 and generate option prices for strikes from 60 to 140, in increments of 5, for times to maturity of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0. Plot the resulting implied volatilities. Compute January 12 2004 bid and ask volatilities (using the Black-Scholes implied volatility function) for IBM options expiring January 17. For which options are you unable to compute a plausible implied volatility? Why? Suppose that the yield curve is given by y(t) = 0.10 − 0.07e −0.12t , and that the short-term interest rate process is dr(t) = (θ(t) − 0.15r(t)) + 0.01dZ. Compute the calibrated Hull-White tree for 5 years, with time ...Consider two zero-coupon bonds with 2 years and 10 years to maturity. Let a = 0.2, b = 0.1, r = 0.05, σVasicek = 10%, and σCIR = 44.721%. The interest rate risk premium is zero in each case. We will consider a position ...Post your question