Fidelity Investments' February 2007 prospectus compares the value of $10,000 invested in the S&P 500 versus its value invested in Fidelity's Select Natural Resources Portfolio over the life of this fund. The paired data below are the values, in dollars, of the $10,000 invested in the S&P 500, and in the Fidelity Select Natural Resources (FSNR) fund for a random sample of years: (9,200, 14,500), (16,300, 21,000), (18,700, 33,100) (28,500, 36,700), (19,600, 29,200), (35,300, 37,200), (8,900, 21,700), (20,700, 36,100), (14,800, 7,800). Within the limitations of this analysis, is FSNR a better investment, over the range of years reported, than the S&P 500?
Answer to relevant QuestionsThe median amount of accounts payable to a CVS retail outlet in May 2007 is believed to be $78.50. Conduct a test to assess whether this assumption is still true after several changes in company operations have taken place. ...According to Mediaweek, there are three methods of advertising on the Web. Method 1 is to serve ads to users who clicked on an icon for the ad; Method 2 serves ads through visits to the company's Web site. And Method 3 uses ...In testing to find a cure for congenital heart disease, the condition of a patient after he or she has been treated with a drug cannot be directly quantified, but the patient's condition can be compared with those of other ...Returns on an investment have been known to be normally distributed with mean 11% (annualized rate) and standard deviation 2%. A brokerage firm wants to test the null hypothesis that this statement is true and collects the ...A computer is used for generating random numbers. It is necessary to test whether the numbers produced are indeed random. A common method of doing this is to look at runs of odd versus even digits. Conduct the test using the ...
Post your question