Five employees of American Electric Power Service Cor p. (AEP) invented a new product. "In consideration of the sum of One Dollar (1.00), and of other good and valuable consideration paid to the under- signed Assignor," each employee signed an agreement giving AEP exclusive patent rights to the invention. Some of the employees sued, alleging that there was no contract because AEP never paid the one dollar. How do you think the court ruled? Explain your reasoning.
Answer to relevant QuestionsThis appeal arises out of the trial court's division of property in a divorce case. Vincent Simmons appeals from the trial court's order awarding to his wife, Doro- thy Simmons, a one-half interest in land that he inherited ...On February 1, 2004, Zhang entered into a contract to buy former realtor Frank Sorichetti's Las Vegas home for $532,500. The contract listed a March clos- ing date and a few household furnishings as part of the sale. On ...What is the relationship between contracts in restraint of trade and unconscionable contracts? Distinguish innocent misrepresentation from fraudulent misrepresentation. CEI and NU were planning a multibillion-dollar merger. Among the terms and conditions of the underlying merger agreement, CEI agreed to purchase all of NU's outstanding shares for $3.6 billion--$1.2 billion over the ...
Post your question