Question: Following Adarand v Pe a the district court held that the
Following Adarand v. Peña, the district court held that the affirmative action program in federal highway contracts was unconstitutional. Do you agree with this decision? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsOn balance, is the legacy of the American Fur Company and of the fur trade itself a positive legacy? Or is the impact of these companies predominantly negative?Do you support KFC Corporation or People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in this controversy? Why? What are the pros and cons of ranking shareholders over employees and other stakeholders? Is it wrong to see employees as costs of production? Should GE have rebalanced its priorities?Do you believe that the Department of Transportation’s current rules for helping DBEs get highway construction contracts pass the strict scrutiny requirement?Should George Keyworth have been asked to resign? Why or why not?
Post your question