# Question

For binary response variables, one reason that logistic regression is usually preferred over straight-line regression is that a fixed change in x often has a smaller impact on a probability p when p is near 0 or near 1 than when p is near the middle of its range. Let y refer to the decision to rent or to buy a home, with p = the probability of buying, and let x = weekly family income. In which case do you think an increase of $100 in x has greater effect: when x = 50,000 (for which p is near 1), when x = 0 (for which p is near 0), or when x = 500? Explain how your answer relates to the choice of a linear versus logistic regression model.

## Answer to relevant Questions

When we use R2 for a random sample to estimate a population R2, it’s a bit biased. It tends to be a bit too large, especially when n is small. Some software also reports Adjusted R2 = R2 - {p/[n - (p + 1)]}(1 - R2), where ...A regression formula that gives a parabolic shape instead of a straight line for the relationship between two variables is μy = α + β1x + β2 x2. a. Explain why this is a multiple regression model, with x playing the role ...An extensive survey by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, conducted in 2007, details views on religion in the United States. Based on interviews with a representative sample of more than 35,000 Americans age 18 and ...Each of 100 restaurants in a fast-food chain is randomly assigned one of four media for an advertising campaign: A = radio, B = TV, C = newspaper, D = mailing. For each restaurant, the observation is the change in sales, ...Refer to the previous two exercises. When we allow interaction, two of the rows in the new ANOVA table are Where Group*Repeat denotes the interaction effect. a. Show the hypotheses, test statistic, and P-value for the test ...Post your question

0