For several years, Albert acted as a collection agent for Paulette. Recently, Paulette revoked Albert’s authority to collect payments from customers. However, neither Paulette nor Albert told any customers of Albert’s termination. Yesterday, Theresa, one of Paulette’s customers, paid Albert the money owed to Paulette. Albert never gave this money to Paulette. Is Theresa liable to pay Paulette? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant Questions(a) What are the two premises of tort liability? (b) When are punitive damages appropriate in a tort case? Tammy was shopping in Save-a-Lot Grocery Store when Stewart, an employee, brushed Tammy’s ankle with a grocery cart. A short time later, while still shopping, Tammy told Stewart that he should say “Excuse me,” and then ...Robert left his position as commercial airline pilot to undertake his duties in the Marine Reserves for a tour of duty in Iraq. When he returns home a year later, his employer apologetically tells him that they filled his ...Describe the nature and limitations of the NLRB’s jurisdiction. If the workforce is unionized, the company must bargain in good faith over all mandatory bargaining issues. Such issues are those related to wages, hours, and other terms or conditions of employment. 1. Is a Christmas gift ...
Post your question