From time to time courts are called on to determine the enforceability of an arbitration clause contained in a contract. One such case was DiMercurio v.Sphere Drake Insurance, 202 F. 3d 71 (1st Cir. 2000). DiMercurio was injured in 1994 when the commercial fishing vessel in which he was working sank. The vessel was owned by R& M, which was found by a court to be liable to DiMercurio for his injuries and ordered to pay $ 350,000 in compensation. However, because R& M had no other assets, it assigned to DiMercurio all the rights it had against Sphere Drake, the London-based insurer of the fishing vessel. When DiMercurio looked to Sphere Drake for payment, it denied the claim and invoked the arbitration clause in its insurance policy with R& M, which required the arbitration to take place in England. Should DiMercurio be required to pursue his claim through arbitration in England? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsFrom 2010 through 2012 many state legislatures considered or passed laws outlawing aspects of Islamic or Shariah law. Some of them would have prohibited the enforcement of private contracts in which a “butcher would no ...a. What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of each form of doing business in a foreign country? b. Why would a firm choose one form over another? 1. Identify the statutory language the court had to interpret to resolve this case. 2. How did the FWS select the areas included in its designation of 8.6 million acres as critical habitat for the owl? 3. What contrary ...Economist Robert Crandall: Our best chances for regulatory reform in certain environmental areas, particularly in air pollution policy, come from the states. Probably, responsibility for environmental regulation belongs with ...The issue of net neutrality raises the question of whether regulation is either appropriate or necessary to restrict unwanted behavior. Would you favor imposing the same rules on wired and wireless ISPs? If so, which ...
Post your question