Goswami failed to pay her $ 900 credit card bill. A collection agency, ACEI, mailed her a collection letter with a blue bar across the envelope saying “Priority Letter.” The letter did not, in fact, constitute priority mail. The purpose of the bar was to encourage Goswami to open the envelope. Was the bar a deceptive practice in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsSan Francisco Bay area consumers Wanda Greenwood, Ladelle Hatfield, and Deborah McCleese each signed up for an Aspire Visa credit card marketed by CompuCredit Corp. of Atlanta, Georgia. The card was advertised as a means of ...William Cohan, writing in The New York Times, objected to the federal government’s consumer protection efforts in the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, including the creation of the Consumer ...Why do developed countries such as the United States regulate trade through the mechanisms described in this section? Why might a less developed country do so? To promote fair trade the WTO prohibits the practice of dumping. ...If you were the vice president for supply chain management for a large manufacturer or retailer, what type of labor standards would you impose on suppliers from other countries, if any? When doing business abroad, does a ...Zedan received a telephone call from a Saudi Arabian organization offering him an engineering position at a construction project in Saudi Arabia. The Ministry of Communications, an agency of the government, guaranteed ...
Post your question