Government agents suspected that marijuana was being grown in the home of Danny Kyllo, who lived in
Question:
Kyllo was indicted for manufacturing marijuana, a violation of federal criminal law. Kyllo moved to suppress the imaging evidence and the evidence it led to, arguing that it was an unreasonable search that violated the Fourth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. Is the use of a thermal imaging device aimed at a private home from a public street to detect relative amounts of heat within the home a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment? Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 121 S. Ct. 2038, 2001 U. S. Lexis 4487 (Supreme Court of the United States, 2001)
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Business Law Legal Environment Online Commerce Business Ethics and International Issues
ISBN: 978-0134004006
9th edition
Authors: Henry R. Cheeseman
Question Posted: