Greg Allen is an employee, shareholder, and director of Greg Allen Construction Co., and its president. In 1996, Daniel and Sondra Estelle hired Allen’s firm to renovate a home they owned in Ladoga, Indiana. To finance the cost, they obtained a line of credit from Banc One, Indiana, which required periodic inspections before it would disburse funds. Allen was on the job every day and supervised all of the work. He designed all of the structural changes, including a floor system for the bedroom over the living room, the floor system of the living room, and the stairway to the second floor. He did all of the electrical, plumbing, and carpentry work and installed all of the windows. He did most of the drywall taping and finishing and most of the painting. The Estelles found much of this work to be unacceptable, and the bank’s inspector agreed that it was of poor quality. When Allen failed to act on the Estelles’ complaints, they filed a suit in an Indiana state court against Allen Construction and Allen personally, alleging, in part, that his individual work on the project was negligent. Can both Allen and his corporation be held liable for this tort? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsThomas Persson and Jon Nokes founded Smart Inventions, Inc., in 1991 to market household consumer products. The success of their first product, the Smart Mop, continued with later products, which were sold through ...If you could dictate a corporation’s rule with respect to the removal of its directors, what would you prescribe? Why?Now suppose that Firm Body did not bring an action against Brock. What type of lawsuit might Penada be able to bring based on these facts? David Brock is on the board of directors of Firm Body Fitness, Inc., which owns a ...Steve and Marie Venturini were involved in the operation of Steve’s Sizzling Steakhouse in Carlstadt, New Jersey, from the day their parents opened it in the 1930s. By the 1980s, Steve, Marie, and her husband Joe were ...The Legal Environment Dimension At the time of the defendants’ appeal, S & S had twelve employees and, according to Stacy, its business was thriving. Should the court have taken these factors into consideration when ...
Post your question