Question

Harris County arrested Carl Pruett for violating a law prohibiting bail-bond businesses from soliciting individuals with outstanding arrest war rants. The purpose of the law, according to the county, was to prevent individuals from fleeing the county when notified of their outstanding arrest warrants by bail- bonding companies. Pruett argued that the law was an unconstitutional restriction of his right to free speech. How do you think the court ruled in this case? Why?


$1.99
Sales1
Views64
Comments0
  • CreatedOctober 21, 2015
  • Files Included
Post your question
5000