Harris County arrested Carl Pruett for violating a law prohibiting bail-bond businesses from soliciting individuals with outstanding arrest war rants. The purpose of the law, according to the county, was to prevent individuals from fleeing the county when notified of their outstanding arrest warrants by bail- bonding companies. Pruett argued that the law was an unconstitutional restriction of his right to free speech. How do you think the court ruled in this case? Why?
Answer to relevant QuestionsIn April 1986 the FBI arrested Larry Dean Dusenbery in his home. After the FBI removed Dusenbery from the premises and placed him in custody, it obtained and executed a search war rant for his property. During the search, ...An interstate trucking company fi led suit against the state of Michigan, alleging that Michigan's $100 annual fee on trucks involved in intrastate commerce violates the dormant commerce clause. The trucking company argued ...Explain the federal laws that are currently being used to try to fight white-collar crime. List and defi ne the elements that are necessary to prove a case of negligence. Explain the bundle-of-sticks idea as it relates to intellectual property.
Post your question