Harrison, the owner and operator of a men’s clothing store in Westport, Connecticut, ordered a variety of clothing items from Ninth Street East, a clothing manufacturer in Los Angeles. Harrison was notified that the terms of the sale were FOB Los Angeles. When the truck carrying the goods arrived at Harrison’s store, Harrison’s wife insisted that the goods be placed inside the door, but the carrier refused. The dispute was not resolved, and the carrier kept the merchandise and left the store premises. The merchandise was subsequently lost by the carrier. Harrison notified Ninth Street East of the nondelivery of the goods. Many attempts were made to locate the merchandise, but without success. Ninth Street East then sued Harrison for the purchase price of the goods. Harrison refused to pay. Is Ninth Street East entitled to payment? ( Ninth Street East, Ltd. v. Harrison, Conn. 259
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhile he was a soldier in the U. S. Army during World War II, Lieber found some of Adolf Hitler’s personal effects. Twenty- two years later, while Lieber was living in Louisiana, his chauffeur stole the collection and sold ...What are the implications for the buyer, if, before accepting delivery of the goods, he or she fails to inspect for defects? Berry, a merchant and owner of a fabric store, ordered fabric from Lanny, a wholesaler. Lanny sent the goods specifically ordered by Berry. When the rolls of fabric arrived, Berry did not take time to inspect them. She ...How do you determine whether a statement made by a seller to a consumer is an express warranty or mere sales puffing? McDonald’s, a leading fast- food chain of restaurants in the United States, was sued by Arnold Pellman and other teenagers, all New York residents who frequently ate at McDonald’s outlets, contending that they suffered ...
Post your question