Henry Lile owned a house. When the land on which it was situated was condemned for a highway, he moved the house to the land of his daughter, Sarah Crick. In the course of construction work, blasting damaged the house. Sarah Crick sued the contractors, Terry & Wright, who claimed that Lile should be joined in the action as a plaintiff and that Sarah could not sue by herself because it was Lile’s house. Were the defendants correct? [Terry & Wright v. Crick, 418 S.W.2d 217 (Ky.)]
Answer to relevant QuestionsBradt believed his backyard ran all the way to a fence. Actually, a strip on Bradt’s side of the fence belonged to his neighbor Giovannone, but Bradt never intended to take land away from anyone. Bradt later brought an ...Union Electric wishes to construct a new coal-fired plant in the northeastern corner of Arizona. Union plans to use the maximum achievement technology for the scrubbers on the plant to reduce emissions. Will Union be able to ...Patrick Bossenberry owned a house in a planned community area. Each lot in the area was limited by a restrictive covenant to use for a single-family dwelling. The covenant defined family as a blood or marital relationship ...James Santelli was staying at a motel owned by Abu Rahmatullah for several months as he worked at a nearby construction project. Joseph Pryor had been previously employed at the motel as a general maintenance man. There was ...Ms. Lingenfelter’s will was offered for probate and was opposed. The Ms. Lingenfelter (the testatrix) testatrix was sick, highly nervous, and extremely jealous, and she committed suicide a week after executing the will. ...
Post your question