IBM Corporation has been retraining many of its employees to assume marketing positions. As part of this effort, the company wanted to test four possible methods of training marketing personnel to determine if at least one of the methods was better than the others. Four groups of 70 employees each were assigned to the four training methods. The employees were pretested for marketing ability and put into groups of four, each group constituting a block with approximately equal prior ability. Then the four employees in each group were randomly assigned to the four training methods and retested after completion of the three-week training session. The differences between their initial scores and final scores were computed. The results were analyzed using a block design ANOVA. The results of the analysis include: SSTR = 9,875, SSBL = 1,445 and SST = 22,364. Are all four training methods equally effective? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsAn enterprising art historian recently started a new business: the production of walking-tour audiotapes for use by those visiting major cities. She originally produced tapes for eight cities: Paris, Rome, London, Florence, ...Young affluent U.S. professionals are creating a growing demand for exotic pets. The most popular pets are the Shiba Inu dog breed, Rottweilers, Persian cats, and Maine coons. Prices for these pets vary and depend on supply ...Let us continue discussing the ideas about studying wines using analysis of variance begun in the introduction to this chapter. The four important wine grapes in the introduction are to be compared using ANOVA to see whether ...For the data given below, regress one variable on the other. Is there an implication of causality, or are both variables affected by a third? Compute the sample correlation coefficient for the data of problem 10–11. In problem An article in the Journal of Monetary Economics assesses the relationship between percentage growth in wealth over a decade and a half of ...
Post your question