If mergers and acquisitions quite often end up providing a competitive disadvantage, why do so many of

Question:

If mergers and acquisitions quite often end up providing a competitive disadvantage, why do so many of them take place? Given the poor track record of such outings, is the continuing M&A activity a result of principal–agent problems and managerial hubris? What can be done to overcome principal–agent problems? Are there other reasons for poor performance?


Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: