Question: If the Durbin Watson statistic is near 2 for the ft
If the Durbin-Watson statistic is near 2 for the ft of an SRM to monthly data, have we proven that the errors are independent and meet the assumption of the SRM?
Answer to relevant QuestionsThe Durbin-Watson statistic for the ft of the least squares regression in this fgure is 0.25. Should you interpret the value of D as indicating dependence, or is it really an artifact of a different problem? (Note: The value ...This data table contains the listed prices (in thousands of dollars) and the number of square feet for 28 homes in or near Seattle. The data come from the Web site of a realtor offering homes in the area. Use the selling ...This dataset tracks monthly performance of stock in Apple from January 1990 through December 2011, a total of 264 months. The data include returns on the entire stock market, Treasury Bills (short-term, 30-day loans to the ...A marketing research analysis considered how two customer characteristics affect their customers’ stated desire for their product. Potential customers in a focus group were shown prototypes of a new convenience product and ...Refer to the context of the motel chain in Exercise 32. Assume that the estimated model meets the conditions for using the MRM for inference. (a) Does the estimated multiple regression equation explain statistically ...
Post your question