Question: In 2009 Mitchell was employed at will as an anesthesia technician
In 2009, Mitchell was employed at-will as an anesthesia technician at the University of Kentucky (UK) Chandler Medical Center, while also attending the university as a graduate student. He had a valid license to carry a concealed deadly weapon under Kentucky law. On April 22, 2009, several of Mitchell’s coworkers were under the impression that he had a firearm in his employee locker, and they reported this to hospital administration. Hospital administrators contacted the UK police department. When questioned, Mitchell denied having a firearm in his locker. Police and hospital administrators searched Mitchell’s locker with his permission but found no weapons. Mitchell informed the police officers that he had a concealed carry license and admitted that he kept a firearm in his vehicle, which was parked on campus. Campus police escorted Mitchell to his car, where he showed them the semiautomatic pistol he had stored in his vehicle. On April 29, 2009, the university terminated Mitchell’s employment for violation of its policy prohibiting possession of a deadly weapon on university property or while conducting university business. Mitchell filed suit, alleging termination in violation of public policy. Decide. Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsKatherine Born and Rick Gillispie were employed by a Blockbuster Video store in Iowa. Blockbuster maintained a policy that forbade dating between supervisors and their subordinates. Born and Gillispie were dismissed for ...Many companies refer to credit reports when investigating job applicants. The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires employers to notify and receive authorization from applicants to use their credit reports in making hiring ...1. A & F defenders have argued that the clothier has the right to promote an image of its choice as a means of making a profit. a. The law aside, is Abercrombie simply wrong to project an image that, however it is labeled, ...1. Core, a social services worker, had difficulty breathing at work when she was exposed to the perfume Japanese Cherry Blossom, worn by coworkers; on one occasion, she sought emergency medical treatment. Core’s coworkers ...1. Plaintiff’s (employee’s) prima facie case (sufficient to be presumed true unless proven otherwise) is confirmed by proving each of the following ingredients: a. Plaintiff belongs to a protected class. b. Plaintiff ...
Post your question