In discussing Figure, the text states that the private equilibrium output, Q1, is inefficient. By definition, inefficiency is supposed to mean that everyone could be better off with a different allocation of resources. Does the subsidy shown in the diagram benefit everyone, including the taxpayer who pays to finance it? If not, what type of policy could be used that would benefit everyone?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhat economic forces might explain why the relative price of telephone services fell while the relative price of medical care increased between 1983 and 2013?Given two parallel, downward-sloping, linear demand curves, is the demand elasticity the same at any given price? Given two downward-sloping, linear demand curves, with one showing consumption to be 50 percent greater than ...Imelda spends her entire income on shoes and hats. Draw the budget line for each of the following situations, identifying the intercepts and the slope in each case. a. Monthly income is $ 1,000, the price of a pair of shoes ...A miracle drug that cures obesity is developed and produced competitively at a constant cost to producers of 10 cents per dose. The companies that produce the drug, however, discharge chemical wastes resulting from the ...Because the federal government covered the lion’s share of the costs, Los Angeles built the 17.4-mile-long Red Line subway system in the 1990s, at a cost of $ 4.7 billion ($ 270 million per mile). The fully allocated costs ...
Post your question