In January 2003, the late Professor David Bradford told a New York Times reporter that a consumption tax discourages work effort. Shortly thereafter, he received the following e- mail: “Since when is a tax on consumption a disincentive to work? This sort of specious reasoning ran amok in this article. I laughed as I saw it was labeled ‘Economic Analysis.’ ” Who was correct, Professor Bradford or his correspondent? Justify your answer using either an arithmetic or algebraic argument.
Answer to relevant QuestionsExplain how you would expect a libertarian, a social democrat, and someone with an organic conception of the state to react to the following laws: a. A law prohibiting receiving compensation for organ donation. b. A law ...In 2012, presidential candidate Mitt Romney proposed extending the cut in marginal income tax rates passed during the Bush administration. Explain why theory alone cannot predict how labor supply would be affected if this ...In his commencement address at Wesleyan Uni-versity in 2008, then- Senator Barack Obama told the students that “our individual salvation depends on collective salvation.” Is this view consistent with the social welfare ...Ramesh lives two periods. His earnings in the present are 100; in the future they are 75.6. The interest rate is 8 percent. a. Suppose that Ramesh’s earnings are subject to a 25 percent tax. Suppose also that interest ...In California, property values are reassessed only after a sale has taken place. For proper-ties that have not been sold in the past year, the law allows only a small increase in the assessed value. Consequently, someone who ...
Post your question