In October 1995, the United Kingdom Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) issued a warning to 190,000

Question:

In October 1995, the United Kingdom Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) issued a warning to 190,000 general practitioners, pharmacists, and directors of public health about oral contraceptive pills containing gestodene or desogestrel. The warning, based on three unpublished epidemiological research studies, stated, €œIt is well known that the pill may rarely produce thrombosis (blood clots) involving veins of the legs. New evidence has become available indicating that the chance of thrombosis occurring in a vein increases about two-fold for some types of pills compared to others.€ 12 Table 6.15 provides data from one of the studies.
Table 6.15 Impact of third generation contraceptive pills on venous thrombosis.
In October 1995, the United Kingdom Committee on Safety of

Since the occurrence of venous thrombosis is very rare (1 in 7000 for people using the second generation pill), 13 259 subjects were selected who had thrombosis and 651 similar subjects (from hospitals and community) who did not have thrombosis. Then these subjects were classified by the type of contraceptive they used.
a. Was either the explanatory (row) or the response (column) variable fixed before the study was conducted?
b. Is this an example of an experiment or an observational study?
c. Is this a cross-classification, cohort, or case-control study?
d. Create a segmented bar chart for the data. e. Use a two-sided hypothesis and Fisher€™s exact test to determine if the type of contraceptive impacts the likelihood of thrombosis. Do you expect that researchers took care to collect a simple random sample of subjects? What conclusions can be drawn? The warning contained no numerical information other than the fact that the chance of blood clots was likely to double when birth control pills contained gestodene or desogestrel. This warning was widely publicized throughout the press, and evidence suggests that, as a result of this warning, many women ceased contraception altogether. Evidence shows a strong association between the warning and an increase in the number of unintended pregnancies and abortions (especially in women younger than 20 years old). This resulted in an estimated increase in cost of £21 million for maternity care and £ 4 to £ 6 million for abortion provision.14
f. Remember that the actual occurrence of venous thrombosis is only 1 in 7000. If third generation pills double the chances of venous thrombosis, the likelihood of occurrence is still only 2 in 7000. Explain the difference between absolute risk reduction and relative risk reduction in this study.
g. Death from venous thrombosis related to third generation pills is estimated to be 1 in 11 million, much lower than the probability of death resulting from pregnancy.15 In 2005, the lifetime risk of maternal death in developed countries was 1 in 7300.16 The CSM warning did suggest that patients see a doctor before altering their contraceptives; however, it appears that many women simply stopped taking any contraceptives. Write a brief statement to the press, general practitioners, pharmacists, and directors of public health about this study.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: