In Theorem 11.2.5 we saw that the ANOVA null is equivalent to all contrasts being 0. We

Question:

In Theorem 11.2.5 we saw that the ANOVA null is equivalent to all contrasts being 0. We can also write the ANOVA null as the intersection over another set of hypotheses.
(a) Show that the hypotheses
H0: θ1 = θ2 = ... = θk versus H1: θi, ≠ θj for some i, j
and the hypotheses
H0: θi - θj = 0 for all i, j versus H1: θi - θj ≠ 0 for some i, j
are equivalent.
(b) Express H0 and H1 of the ANOVA test as unions and intersections of the sets
Θij = {θ = (θ1,..., θk) : θi - θj = O}.
Describe how these expressions can be used to construct another (different) union-intersection test of the ANOVA null hypothesis.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Statistical Inference

ISBN: 978-0534243128

2nd edition

Authors: George Casella, Roger L. Berger

Question Posted: