In using the Kruskal-Wallis test, there is a correction factor that should be applied whenever there are many ties: Divide H by
For each individual group of tied observations in the combined set of all sample data, calcu-late T = t3 — t, where t is the number of observations that are tied within the individual group. Find t for each group of tied values, then compute the value of T for each group, then add the T values to get ΣT. The value of Nis the total number of observations in all samples combined. Use this procedure to find the corrected value of H for Exercise 11. Does the cor-rected value of H differ substantially from the value found in Exercise 11 ?
Answer to relevant QuestionsIf the methods of this section are used with paired sample data, and the conclusion is that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a correlation between the two variables, can we use the methods of Section 10-3 ...The following table lists overall quality scores and prices of 40-inch LCD televisions. Do these data suggest that you can get better quality by spending more? Use the rank correlation coefficient to test for a correlation ...Refer to Data Set 6 in Appendix B and use the paired data con¬sisting of brain volume (cm3) and IQ score. Use the data from Appendix B to testfor rank correlation with a 0.05 significance level. In 1970, a lottery was used to determine who would be drafted into the U.S. Army. The 366 dates in the year were placed in individual capsules, they were mixed, then cap¬sules were selected to identify birth dates of men to ...Refer to the same data from Exercise 2. Use a 0.05 significance level with the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test to test the claim that differences between fares for flights scheduled 1 day in advance and those scheduled 30 days in ...
Post your question