Is it harder to find statistical significance using a test with level 0.05 or a test with level 0.01? In other words, would a test that is statistically significant using 0.05 always be statistically significant using 0.01, would it be the other way around, or does it depend on the situation? Explain your answer.
Answer to relevant QuestionsExplain whether each of the following is possible. a. A relationship exists in the observed sample but not in the population from which the sample was drawn. b. A relationship does not exist in the observed sample but does ...Participants were asked how many times in the past year they had experienced at least one of the 13 hangover symptoms listed. Responses were categorized as 0 times, 1–2 times, 3–11 times, 12–51 times, and > 52 times. ...For each of the following possible conclusions, state whether it would follow when the p-value is greater than 0.05 (assuming a level of 0.05 is desired for the test). a. Reject the null hypothesis. b. Reject the alternative ...A small business performs a service and then bills its customers. From past experience, 90% of the customers pay their bills within a week. a. What is the probability that a randomly selected customer will not pay within a ...Suppose you routinely check coin-return slots in vending machines to see if they have any money in them. You have found that about 10% of the time you find money. a. What is the probability that you do not find money the ...
Post your question