Is the market’s anticipation of the GN/ BN in earnings during 12 months prior to the month of release of the earnings release, as Ball and Brown found in Figure 5.3, consistent with a correlation or a causation argument for the effect of accounting information on abnormal stock returns? Explain. With which argument is the market response during month 0 most consistent? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsGive examples of components of net income with a. High persistence b. Persistence of 1 c. Persistence of 0 Assume that the firm uses historical cost accounting.In a classic study, Beaver (1968) examined the trading volume of firms’ securities around the time of their earnings announcements. Specifically, he examined 506 annual earnings announcements of 143 non- December 31 year ...Leo, a rational investor, has $ 5,000 to invest for one year pending the purchase of a house. He has narrowed his choice down to two investments. One is to invest the full amount in shares of Company X (a1). The other is to ...Give some reasons why the payoff from the manager’s current- period effort is typically not fully observable until a subsequent period. How do contracts respond to the need to pay managers currently, despite current ...Tom operates a small, fast- growing electronics business. His workload has expanded to the point where he decides to hire a full- time manager. He will then take one year off to travel, and on his return he will concentrate ...
Post your question