It has been reported that 80% of taxpayers who are audited by the Internal Revenue Service end up paying more money in taxes. Assume that auditors are randomly assigned to cases, and that one of the ways the IRS oversees its auditors is to monitor the percentage of cases that result in the taxpayer paying more taxes. If a sample of 400 cases handled by an individual auditor has 77.0% of those she audited paying more taxes, is there reason to believe her overall “pay more” percentage might be some value other than 80%? Use the 0.10 level of significance in reaching a conclusion. Determine and interpret the p-value for the test.
Answer to relevant QuestionsBased on the sample results in Exercise 10.74, construct and interpret the 90% confidence interval for the population proportion. Is the hypothesized proportion (0.80) within the interval? Given the presence or absence of ...A state representative is reported as saying that about 10% of reported auto thefts involve owners whose cars have not really been stolen, but who are trying to defraud their insurance company. What null and alternative ...When a thread-cutting machine is operating properly, only 2% of the units produced are defective. Since the machine was bumped by a forklift truck, however, the quality-control manager is concerned that it may require ...The average U.S. household has $235,600 in life insurance. A local insurance agent would like to see how households in his city compare to the national average, and selects a simple random sample of 30 households from the ...The data in file XR11100 are the weights (in grams) for random samples of grain packages filled by two different filling machines. The machines have a fine adjustment for the mean amount of fill, but the standard deviations ...
Post your question