Question: It unquestionably makes sense for governments to manage certain government wide
It unquestionably makes sense for governments to manage certain government-wide services, such as vehicle repair and computer services, in a separate organizational unit, and to control demand by beneﬁciary units by charging them usage fees. In the government-wide statements, internal service fund assets and liabilities are classiﬁed as governmental activities and expenses, most of which are typically accounted for in the general fund, are charged back to the beneﬁciary units. Moreover, the resources of internal service funds are seldom legally restricted. Would it not make sense for purposes of external (albeit not internal) reporting to do away with internal service funds entirely, and to report all assets, liabilities, and expenses in the funds used to account for the beneﬁciary units?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhat is the distinction, as drawn by the GASB, between a ﬁduciary fund and a permanent fund? How should governments report permanent fund and ﬁduciary fund balances and income in their government-wide statements? Explain.What is a cost-sharing plan? Under the new rules, what will an employer that is a member of a cost-sharing plan have to report as a pension obligation?Christopher City received a contribution of $520,000 to provide scholarships to the children of deceased city employees. The donor stipulated that all income, including both realized and unrealized investment gains, should ...On January 1, 2015, the balance sheet of a city’s funds for the acquisition of library books showed the following (in thousands):The endowment was established in 2007 with a contribution of cash, securities, and real ...
Post your question