Jessie Romero offered to deliver two trade- in vehicles—a 2003 Mitsubishi Montero SP and a 2002 Chevrolet Silverado pickup—to Scoggin-Dickey Chevrolet Buick, Inc., in exchange for a 2006 Silverado pickup. Scoggin-Dickey agreed. The parties negotiated a price, including a value for the trade- in vehicles, plus cash. Romero paid the cash and took the new Silverado. On inspecting the trade- in vehicles, however, Scoggin-Dickey found that they had little value. The dealer repossessed the Silverado. Did the dealership have the right to inspect the goods and reject them when it did? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWoodridge USA Properties, L. P., bought eighty- seven commercial truck trailers from Southeast Trailer Mart, Inc. (STM). Gerald McCarty, an independent sales agent who arranged the deal, showed Woodridge the documents of ...Stella bought a cup of coffee at the Roasted Bean Drive-Thru. The coffee had been heated to 190 degrees and consequently had dissolved the inside of the cup. When Stella lifted the lid, the cup collapsed, spilling the ...1. How is the principle of comity applied? 2. What considerations can take precedence over comity? 3. What interests were at stake in the dispute at the heart of this case? 4. Did this court apply the principle of comity? ...In 1954, the government of Bolivia began expropriating land from Francisco Loza for public projects, including an international airport. The government directed the payment of compensation in exchange for at least some of ...Peter Gowin was an employee of a granite countertop business owned by Joann Stathis. In November 2015, Gowin signed a promissory note agreeing to pay $ 12,500 in order to become a co- owner of the business. The note was ...
Post your question