Lazear (2001) noted that when one simply compares the performance of students in small and large class sizes, there is little difference, despite the presumption (and experimental evidence) that smaller class sizes improve performance. He argued that one reason for the absence of an observed relationship between class size and student outcomes is that schools may put more disruptive children in smaller classes. How would this practice bias the estimated effect of class size on student outcomes?
Answer to relevant QuestionsOne way to structure a student loan repayment plan is to make it income-contingent—that is, to relate the amount that a student would have to repay in any given month to how much income he or she earns. How might the ...The problem of adverse selection in insurance markets means that it is generally abed deal for companies to offer insurance at the same price for all potential customers. Why then do we observe some insurance companies (such ...There are two types of drivers on the road today. Speed Racers have a 5% chance of causing an accident per year, while Low Riders have a 1% chance of causing an accident per year. There are the same number of Speed Racers as ...Suppose the Social Security payroll tax was increased today to 16.4% to solve the 75- year fiscal imbalance in the program. Explain the effect of this change on the value of the Social Security program for persons of ...Does Social Security provide much benefit in terms of consumption smoothing over the retirement decision? Contrast Social Security with a different social insurance program, unemployment insurance, which provides income ...
Post your question