Lenders are primarily concerned about poor firm performance, since this increases the likelihood that they will not receive their interest and principal. How do lenders benefit if the firm performs well? If lenders benefit when the firm does well, why are they primarily concerned about downside risk? Which accounting policies do lenders want to protect against downside risk? Explain how these policies decrease downside risk.
Answer to relevant QuestionsIn his article “The Impact of Accounting Regulation on the Stock Market: The Case of Oil and Gas Companies,” Lev (1979) examined the daily returns on a portfolio of oil and gas companies’ common shares affected by the ...Following the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, the price of crude oil soared, as did retail gasoline prices. This led the major U. S. oil companies to try to hold down their reported earnings. The oil companies were anxious to ...Beatty, Liao, and Weber (2012) investigated delegated monitoring of public debt issues, under which holders of public debt delegate monitoring of the borrower’s financial performance to a specialist, such as a bank. This ...Explain why the value of ESOs and restricted stock to a manager is generally less than their fair values, such as Black- Scholes value for ESOs, or stock market value for restricted stock. Refer to Theory in Practice re: Zions Bancorporation. Required a. Why would Zions Bancorporation use a market- based approach to estimating its stock option expense, instead of a model- based approach? b. Why is the ESOARS- ...
Post your question