Question: Let us assume as was true of wealthy individuals in
Let us assume, as was true of wealthy individuals in the United States in the 1960s, that the personal tax rate is 70% and that realized capital gains are taxed at half the top personal tax rate— that is, tcg = 35%. Assume that the top corporate rate is 48%. The before tax rate of return on investments is 15%. You are asked to advise a doctor as to whether she should incorporate. What would be the tax advantageous strategy for 5 year, 10 year, and 15 year investment horizons? Suppose that she did incorporate and that 5 years later the personal tax rate falls unexpectedly to 50%. Should she then liquidate her corporation and start a new partnership?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA wealthy taxpayer is planning to start an Internet based business. The taxpayer expects to generate tax losses for at least the first 5 years of the business. The taxpayer also hopes to cash out of the business within 10 ...List some tax rule restrictions that prevent organizational form arbitrage. How do they succeed in preventing this arbitrage? Why do countries encourage investment by offering tax incentives such as investment tax credits or liberal depreciation allowances? What alternative methods exist to achieve the same goals? How would you judge whether tax ...The following investments all bear the same after tax risk premium, rrp. Calculate the risk adjusted pretax rates of return, Rra, for assets II, III, and IV, as well as the expected pretax total return (unadjusted for risk, ...Assume you work for a local municipality. Further assume that there are no tax rule restrictions preventing a municipality from buying taxable bonds financed by tax exempt bonds yielding a lower before tax rate of return. ...
Post your question