Logsdon, who had three children, disliked one of them without any reason. In his will, he left only a small amount to the child he disliked and gave the bulk of his estate to the remaining two. On his death, the disliked child claimed that the will was void and had been obtained by undue influence. Do you agree? [Logsdon v. Logsdon, 104 N.E.2d 622 (Ill.)]
Answer to relevant QuestionsWolf, King, and others sold business “opportunities” in vending machines by taking out ads in newspapers throughout the country. When individuals responded, telemarketers called "fronters" would tell them of false ...Brenner was in the scrap iron business. Almost daily, Plitt lent Brenner money with which to purchase scrap iron. The agreement of the parties was that when the scrap was sold, Plitt would be repaid and would receive an ...Field executed a will. On her death, the will was found in her safe deposit box, but the part of it containing the fifth bequest had been torn from the will. This torn fragment was also found in the box. There was no ...Valerie and Flora are the beneficiaries of a trust left to them by their mother upon her death.Their mother named Art Casanelli, a family friend, as the trustee. Flora has seen Art driving a new car and has learned that he ...Brianna Kriefall, a child, died after she ate meat at a Sizzler restaurant that was later found to contain E. coli. Her family brought suit against Sizzler USA to recover for the loss of their daughter. Is Sizzler liable for ...
Post your question