Mack, a dealer, sold Hudgens a used car on credit. At the time of the sale, Mack fraudulently informed Hudgens that the car was in good condition; in fact, the car needed extensive repairs. When Hudgens attempted to return the car to Mack within the thirty- day guarantee period, Mack refused to take the car back. In the meantime, Mack had assigned Hudgens’s contract to Universal CIT Credit Corp. When Hudgens refused to pay on the contract, Universal CIT sued him. Hudgens’s defense was that he had the right to set aside the contract based on fraud. Was Hudgens correct?
Answer to relevant QuestionsSiler agreed to complete a project for Mountain Bell. To finance the project, Siler borrowed money from First National. As security for the loan, Siler assigned to First National his right to collect from Mountain Bell upon ...How does commercial impracticability change the way that contracts are discharged because they are too difficult to perform? Is commercial impracticability a common law or statutory doctrine? In August, The Cooper Manufacturing Co. contracted with Millard Oil Company for the delivery of 75,000 gallons of heating oil at the price of $ 2.20 per gallon at regularly specified intervals during the upcoming winter ...The seniors at Washington College booked their Graduation Ball at the Washington Plaza Hotel for June 1. The student activities director signed the contract and sent a deposit of $ 500 to the hotel as required to guarantee ...Robert and Sandra Bell hired McCann to build a house for them at a contract price of $ 45,000. McCann then changed his mind and refused to build, claiming that he would make no profit. The Bells then advertised for bids from ...
Post your question