Martin made out a promissory note payable for $ 5,000 and issued the note to Pask. Pask transferred the note to Grimes, who became an HIDC because he purchased it in good faith, not knowing of any defects in the instrument. When the instrument became due, Grimes, without an explanation, refused to pay. Grimes, instead of presenting the note to Martin again for payment, then decided to sell the note, which was now overdue, to Tiller at a discount price simply because Grimes needed the money. Tiller, because of the discount price, still purchased the note, knowing it was overdue. Tiller then demanded payment from Martin, who now claimed fraud in the inducement on the part of Pask. Does Tiller have the right to collect on the note from Martin, the maker, even though Martin claimed fraud?
Answer to relevant QuestionsRoberts issued a negotiable instrument to Blackmar with a promise to provide Roberts with a complete gym set for use in the basement of his house. Roberts had been looking at this set in a catalog provided by Blackmar for ...If there are no defenses to a negotiable instrument, do you have to be an HIDC to collect on the instrument? The Paddocks hired Harper Realty to sell their hotel. The Paddocks agreed that if Harper sold the hotel, they would pay Harper a commission of $ 15,000, with $ 3,000 down and the balance in monthly installments. The Paddocks ...Martin paid a $ 100 debt to Adler with a personal check drawn on her account at the Arvac National Bank. Before properly negotiating the check to Chives, Adler raised the amount of the check to $ 1,100. Chives then cashed ...Explain how a closed shop, a union shop, and an open shop are different from one another.
Post your question